The Tehachapi Area Association of Realtors and their Legislative Committee invited all candidates running for City Council and City Treasurer to a Candidates Forum on October 3rd at the Slice of Life Enrichment Center. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, a number of candidates declined to participate.
The event was an opportunity for all candidates to talk about their reasons for running, their platform and to secure the endorsement of the Tehachapi Area Association of Realtors, one of the most-active and influential group of business men and women in Tehachapi.
“It’s unfortunate that several candidates refused to participate,” legislative committee chair Kathy Carey said to open the event. “It makes it very hard to vote for them.”
Phil Smith, the lone candidate to represent District 1 talked about the revitalization of Downtown, which he represents. Smith touched on the recent wave of private investment into the area and building renovation. Coupled with the public improvements years ago, Tehachapi’s Downtown is stronger than ever. With 18 years of experience with the Kern Council of Governments, Smith also touched on major transportation projects that he’s helped secure for Tehachapi including the recent announcement of a study for Highway 58 truck climbing lanes. His opponent Clete Heckathorn declined to participate.
Joan Pogon-Cord, who is running against incumbent and no-show Dennis Wahlstrom in District 4, touched on her love for senior projects, including new housing for seniors and working with City staff and potential developers to include senior accessible housing in new developments. A long-time coach and teacher, Pogon-Cord also touched on her love of recreation and desire for improvements in facilities around Tehachapi. Incumbent Dennis Wahlstrom refused to participate although grassroots candidate Clint Davies to his credit, took part in the event.
Susan Wiggins, the lone candidate to represent District 5 talked about her involvement and relationships in the City as Mayor Pro-Tem. Wiggins focused on commercial development and how Tehachapi’s new developments are spurning new life into the older commercial buildings as competition grows. Wiggins talked about the importance of building the retail options, so sales tax money stays local to benefit citizens instead of being spent in other communities. Her opponent Clint Beacom continued his streak of not being involved in the community, by declining the invitation.
At large candidate Michael Davies focused on new housing opportunities and his intent to work with City staff and the planning commission to address the housing shortage in Tehachapi. Davies talked about the new inventory sparking a renovation boom among existing homes and how the sales value in Tehachapi has grown over 27% in the last two years. Davies’ father-in-law was a pioneer of the real estate industry in Tehachapi, so his understanding of the real estate market is beneficial. Davies’ opponent Pete Graff declined to participate.
City treasurer Susan Showler, the lone candidate participating for the position focused on the real role of the treasurer and not the made-up role being fabricated by her opponent. Showler, who is very involved with several organizations in this community talked about her love for Tehachapi, her relationship with the finance team at the City and how she wants to continue to serve this community in this role. Her opponent, Amy Colwell, despite making up several new job duties for the treasurer, chose not to elaborate on them by declined the invitation sent out by TAAR.
While insulting, the no-shows by those candidates were not surprising. They made it clear they only want to participate in events hosted by their puppet master, councilman Ken Hetge, in front of a handful of mostly family members, while only giving interviews to basement-webcast shows that they sponsor for the air time.
Tehachapi Citizens for Responsible Government would like to thank TAAR for their willingness to host this event and for the room full of voters that saw what real candidates look like, and how their opponents disrespected the public process by declining to participate.